Validation in swedish of sydney swallow questionnaire. Complications of dysphagia include aspiration leading to chest infection and pneumonia, malnutrition. Oneil, ma, mary purdy, phd, janice falk, ma, and lanelle gallo, ms hartford hartf. Given the lack of available evidence to support the practice of correlating the proposed dysphagia diet. Development and validation of a selfreport symptom. The dysphagia outcome and severity scale springerlink. Doss is a simple, easy touse, 7point scale developed to systematically rate the functional severity of. Inappropriate application can lead to distorted results in clinical studies. Mild oral dysphagia with reduced mastication andor oral retention that is cleared spontaneously dysphagia 1999 l. Functional outcomes following the treatment of lip and oral cavity cancers are important determinants of quality of life. The bulbar section of the norris scale can be utilised as an independent and reliable indicator of the severity of dysphagia in als. The national outcomes measurement system noms is a data collection system developed to illustrate the value of speechlanguage pathology and audiology services provided to adults and children with communication and swallowing disorders. A quantitative prospective research design was used.
We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study from 2008 to 2010 of all patients over 17 years of age admitted to a. Outcome tracking tools in dysphagia management several commonly used outcome tracking tools are listed below. Swallowing outcomes in lip and oral cavity cancers. Dysphagia is common among survivors of critical illness who required mechanical ventilation during treatment. Outcome tracking tools in dysphagia management ciao seminars.
Doss abbreviation stands for dysphagia outcome and severity scale. The measurement of dysphagia severity is important in making management decisions, in prognosticating, and in the objective evaluation of treatment efficacy. Dysphagia severity rating scale dysphagia severity rating scale for parkinsons disease waxman and colleagues, 1990 sevenpoint staging scale ranging from normal swallowing mechanism to severe dysphagia gradations in severity rating are based on patients report, observations of family members or caregivers, and results of. Pdf the dysphagia outcome and severity scale cristobal. Sip size, masa, fois iopi, and pro measures use of scale in clinical assessment are unregulated sips similar to those from vfss. Patients with neuromyogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia in whom the severity of dysphagia had been stable for at least 3 months english 17 items in four domains vas 0 100. Does the addition of specific acupuncture to standard. A fivelevel scale for rating severity of feeding and swallowing disorders based on management needs and health related outcomes pros considers implications of dysphagia.
Only slight, nonsignificant differences were found between the 3. Content, construct, discriminant and predictive validity and testretest reliability were evaluated. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing fees is a suitable method for dysphagia assessment after acute stroke. In collaboration with their colleagues at bpc, occupational therapist pat grisafi and speech pathologist diane hourihan. Table 3 from the dysphagia outcome and severity scale. Dec 31, 2010 the objective of this study was to design a dysphagia severity score dss system and to evaluate its usefulness in profiling dysphagia outcomes. See the assessment section of the dysphagia evidence map for pertinent scientific evidence, expert opinion and clientcaregiver perspective.
The dysphagia outcome and severity scale doss is a simple, easytouse, 7 point scale developed to systematically rate the functional. Psychometric assessment and validation of the dysphagia. A functional outcome swallowing scale for staging oropharyngeal dysphagia. It also determined the effect of clinical experience, vfss audiorecording and training on doss irr. The presence or absence of dysphagia was evaluated, and the degree of severity was measured according to the dysphagia outcome and severity scale doss. The bulbar components of the als specific scales is sensitive to dysphagia.
The dysphagia outcome and severity scale doss is a simple, easytouse, 7point scale developed to systematically rate the functional severity of dysphagia based on objective assessment and make. Functional oral intake scale 1 tube dependent levels 1 no oral intake 2 tube dependent with minimalinconsistent oral intake 3 tube supplements with consistent oral intake total oral intake levels 47 4 total oral intake of a single consistency 5 total oral intake of multiple consistencies requiring special preparation. Because of the lack of a truly objective, reliable, and valid means of measuring overall symptom severity, the symptomatic outcome assessment therapeutic inter. Consistent with the world health organizations who international classification of functioning, disability and health icf framework asha, 2016a. Baselineconfounding variables the registry provided information on patient age, sex, stroke severity based on the canadian neurological scale cns 15,16 and the national institutes of health stroke scale, preevent independence docu.
Predictors and outcomes of dysphagia screening after acute. Paper eng the dysphagia outcome and severity scale. The functional communication measures fcms are a series of sevenpoint rating scales, ranging from least functional level 1 to most functional level 7. This scale measures the severity of dysphagia by examining to what degree patients take food orally on a daily basis. The dsrs is a clinician rated scale that was developed from the dysphagia outcome and severity scale doss 6. Validation in swedish of sydney swallow questionnaire bmc. Google scholar see all references and observerrated severity scales, such as the functional outcome swallowing scale foss for staging oropharyngeal dysphagia, 11 x 11 salassa, j. Fiberoptic endoscopic dysphagia severity scale predicts. Functional oral intake scale swalqol md anderson dysphagia inventory dysphagia severity scale results. Eat10 questionnaire dysphagia assessment thickenup clear. Original article artigo original association between. We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study from 2008 to 2010 of all patients over 17 years. Patients were also excluded if they had no dysphagia as evaluated by speech therapy utilizing the hartford hospital dysphagia rating scale see additional file 1 which was based on the dysphagia outcome and severity scale, or if there was preexisting dysphagia noted by speech therapy due to other comorbid conditions that are known to affect. The doss uses a scale of 7 normal in all situations to 1 severe.
Results showed that the presence of at least 2 of the 6 clinical features consistently distinguished patients with moderate to severe dysphagia from patients with mild dysphagia normal swallowing. Pdf initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral. The dysphagia outcome and severity scale doss is widely used to measure dysphagia severity based on videofluoroscopy vfss. Development and validation of a selfreport symptom inventory. The scale uses objective findings to develop recommendations regarding the safety of oral intake, dietary restrictions, and the need for cueing of compensatory strategies with swallowing. See the assessment section of the pediatric feeding and swallowing evidence map for pertinent scientific evidence, expert opinion, and clientcaregiver perspectives. The secondary outcome measures included the modified barthel index and swallowingrelated quality of life, which were assessed before and after the fourweek therapy period. The dysphagia outcome and severity scale speech language. The dysphagia outcome and severity scale doss is a simple, easy touse, 7point scale developed to systematically rate the functional severity of.
Levels relate to the varying degrees of nonoral feeding. The risk factors associated with the development of postextubation dysphagia, and the effects of dysphagia on patient outcomes, have been relatively unexplored. The dysphagia outcome and severity scale doss is a simple, easytouse, 7point scale developed to systematically rate the functional severity of dysphagia based on objective assessment and make recommendations for diet level, independence level, and type of nutrition. The results of dysphagia outcome severity scale separated 14 patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia and 16 with normal swallowing function. Department of education acknowledges that chronic health conditions could make a student eligible for special education and related services if the disorder interferes with the students strength, vitality, or alertness and limits the students. Dysphagia outcome and severity scalefinal revision the dysphagia outcome and severity scale.
Another weakness in custom scales is that they may not be tested for reliability. The dysphagia outcome and severity scale disfagia brasil. Table 1 from the dysphagia outcome and severity scale. They have been developed by asha to describe the different aspects of a patients functional communication and swallowing abilities over the course of speechlanguage pathology intervention. Outcome tracking tools are commonly used in dysphagia research as a means of objectively measuring. The endoscopist simply has to match their chosen swallow with its scale mate. Clinical outcome data, based on ten clinical parameters describing dysphagic status pre. Swallowing screening is a passfail procedure to identify individuals who require a comprehensive assessment of swallowing function or a referral for other professional andor medical services asha, 2004b. The dysphagia outcome and severity scale gists on observation of swallow deficits on videofluoro doss is a simple, easytouse, 7point scale developed scopic examination and agreement of treatment recom to systematically rate the functional severity of dyspha mendations.
Oropharyngeal dysphagia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The swedish version of the sydney swallow questionnaire was close to the original version, easy to fill in, and well accepted. The dysphagia severity scale dss is a 7point comprehensive ordinal scale that combines treatment and diet table 1 7. Oct 19, 2017 the dysphagia outcome and severity scale doss is widely used to measure dysphagia severity based on videofluoroscopy vfss. Dss is clinically useful because vf or ve is not always required to determine the severity of dysphagia. Generic dysphagia scales are reliable indicators of dysphagia in als. Dementia severity rating scale dsrs page 2 of 5 speech and language 0 normal ability to talk and to understand others. The dysphagia outcome and severity scale doss is a simple, easytouse, 7point scale developed to systematically rate the functional severity of dyspha. Recently, we developed the fiberoptic endoscopic dysphagia severity scale fedss for acute stroke patients, grading dysphagia into 6 severity codes 1 to 6. Levels 46 relate to the varying degrees of oral food intake and alternative nutrition. The dysphagia outcome and severity scale doss is a validated seven point scale which systematically rates the severity of dysphagia. Reliability and validity of a tool to measure the severity of. The yale pharyngeal residue severity rating scale steven. A clinical bedside swallowing assessment was performed in patients referred to a speechlanguage pathologist slp.
In addition to a list of the characteristics for each tool, details about how to obtain each scale are listed as well. The ndd further speculates that a severity outcome scale, such as the dysphagia outcome and severity scale doss may be useful to describe a patients dysphagia sufficiently to begin the diet prescription process for that patient. However, it is still unclear if dysphagia severity can be accurately assessed without using vf or ve. Oropharyngeal dysphagia or swallowing difficulties are common in acute care and critical care, affecting 47% of hospitalised frail elderly, 50% of acute stroke patients and approximately 62% of critically ill patients who have been intubated and mechanically ventilated for prolonged periods. Validity and reliability of a novel patient reported. Reliability and validity of a tool to measure the severity.
This scale can be used by physicians trained to determine the. Oneil, ma, mary purdy, phd, janice falk, ma, and lanelle gallo, ms hartford hospital, hartford, connecticut, usa abstract. There was no difference in the average age, weight and body mass index of the two groups dysphagic patients. Patients were assigned a severity level, independence level, and nutritional level based on three areas most associated with final recommendations. Clinical assessment of swallowing and prediction of. The primary outcome measures included the standardized swallowing assessment and the dysphagia outcome severity scale. Pdf the dysphagia outcome and severity scale mary purdy.
Advancing practice pitts iccd 2014 5 clinical measures. None of the methods are a perfect match to the ndd. Association between functionality assessment scales and the. The dysphagia outcome and severity scale gists on observation of swallow deficits on videofluorodoss is a simple, easytouse, 7point scale developed scopic examination and agreement of treatment recomto systematically rate the. Interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in acute and. What is the abbreviation for dysphagia outcome and severity scale. All groups found signifncant therapy effects on the dysphagia severity scale swalqol and mdadi. Although feeding, swallowing and dysphagia are not specifically mentioned in idea, the u. When using such custom scales that have not been tested for validity, there is no certainty that the scale is accurately measuring the outcome that it is intending to measure. Evidencebased practice in the treatment of dysphagia in. Both have extensive backgrounds in dysphagia management in people with psychiatric disorders and choking risk management in patients with mild symptoms of dysphagia associated with medications side effects.
Eat10 is a dysphagia assessment that helps to measure swallowing difficulties. The dysphagia outcome and severity scale doss is a simple, easytouse, 7 point scale developed to systematically rate the functional severity of dysphagia. This study was conducted to utilize widely accepted instruments such as the american speech and hearing associations national outcomes measurement system noms and vas pain scales to validate a novel, patientreported instrument that quantifies the severity of postoperative dysphagia, odynophagia, and voice disabilities dov. Dysphagia outcome and severity scale doss 7 is a scale developed to systemically evaluate the dysphagia functional severity based on the objective evaluation and to make recommendations on the type of diet, level of independency and type of nutrition. The vss was scored on a scale of 0 to 4 0normal, 1mild, 2moderate, 3moderatesevere, 4severe dysphagia. Has the participant learned to take small sips independently per recs.
Intermittent supervisioncueing, one or two consistencies restricted may exhibit one or more of the following retention in pharynx cleared with cue retention in the oral cavity that is cleared with cue aspiration with one consistency, with weak or no reflexive cough or airway penetration to the level of the vocal. Pdf the dysphagia outcome and severity scale researchgate. Patients were assigned a dysphagia outcome and severity scale. Interrater reliability of the dysphagia outcome and severity. This study investigated interrater reliability irr of the doss. May 10, 20 patients were also excluded if they had no dysphagia as evaluated by speech therapy utilizing the hartford hospital dysphagia rating scale see additional file 1 which was based on the dysphagia outcome and severity scale, or if there was preexisting dysphagia noted by speech therapy due to other comorbid conditions that are known to affect. Be sure to talk with your physician about treatment options for symptoms. Accuracy of dysphagia severity scale rating without using. Paper eng the dysphagia outcome and severity scale doss. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the fedss as a predictor of outcomes at 3 months and intermediate complications during acute treatment.
187 60 1028 1174 920 242 733 111 1424 247 1451 1490 1237 435 383 288 324 1077 1474 614 1026 1029 542 182 26 717 363 1081 696 1330 215 1079 1299 477 983 134 812 882 1117 772 1482 322 396 993 1013 1080 795 336 889 860 204